Fwd: [Moderator Action] Re: W3C specifications important for the DPUB industry.

(forwarding for archival)

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: W3C specifications important for the DPUB industry.
> Date: 24 Jun 2014 10:09:23 GMT+2
> To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
> 
> I’m not a member of the DPUB IG but since you’re calling for a larger review here are a few comments:
> 
>  Almost all the specs from the Web Application WG are relevant IMO (if not for current EPUB 3.x, at least for the future of digital publishing). To name a few:
> 
>   - Manifest for web applications (WD) http://w3c.github.io/manifest/
>   - Service Workers (WD) http://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/
>   - Custom Elements (WD) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/
>   - HTML Imports (WD) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/imports/
>   - Shadow DOM (D) http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/
> 
>  The table can also include Jeni Tennison’s TAG draft on packaging:
> 
>   - Packaging on the Web (ED) http://w3ctag.github.io/packaging-on-the-web/
> 
>  The specs from the IndieUI WG may be more relevant to reading systems, but are important to adaptability and a11y:
> 
>   - User Context 1.0 (ED) https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndieUI/raw-file/default/src/indie-ui-context.html
>   - Events 1.0 (WD) http://www.w3.org/TR/indie-ui-events/
> 
>  Note also that ARIA 1.1 is not in the table (ARIA 1.0 is), although it’s already referenced by EPUB 3.0.1 (notably for its aria-describedat attribute).
> 
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Romain.
> 
> 
> --
> Romain Deltour, Software Developer
> The DAISY Consortium
> http://www.daisy.org
> 
> 
> 
> On 24 juin 2014, at 08:33, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> A few months ago I had started an initial list of W3C specifications that are important for the Digital Publishing industry [1], as it is required in our interest Group Charter deliverables [1].
>> 
>> Thanks to them, a few participants of the DPUB IG have edited and update this table.
>> 
>> I would like to request a review from a larger group of participants, to enrich this list with W3C technologies that you may be aware of and are missing in this table.
>> 
>> Then we will have to  prioritized this list, according to our charter.
>> 
>> Thank you for your collaboration,
>> 
>> Thierry Michel.
>> 
>> 
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/W3C_specs_for_DPUB
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/02/digpubig.html
>> 
>> 
>> On 01/04/2014 15:13, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Per my action item, I have started a list of W3C specifications that are
>>> important for the Digital Publishing industry.
>>> 
>>> https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/W3C_specs_for_DPUB
>>> 
>>> this is only a start, therefore  feel free to add/update this table with
>>> new specs.
>>> 
>>> If you have any issues regarding this task, let me know.
>>> 
>>> Thierry.
>> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me