[Minutes] 2014-01-06 Digital Publishing Interest Group Teleconference

Hi all,

The minutes of the Digital Publishing Interest Group Teleconference 
dated 2014-01-06 are now available at

http://www.w3.org/2014/01/06-dpub-minutes.html

These public minutes are also linked  from the dpub wiki
http://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Meetings

Also find these minutes in a text version following, for your convenience.

Best,

Thierry Michel

--------------------------------------------------
    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

             Digital Publishing Interest Group Teleconference

06 Jan 2014

    See also: [2]IRC log

       [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/01/06-dpub-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Liza, +33.1.41.23.aaaa, Ivan, dauwhe, mgylling, Tzviya,
           laudrain, azaroth, fjh, +1.347.633.aabb, benjaminsko,
           Stearns, duga, gcapiel, JeanKaplansky, Laura_Fowler,
           tmichel, Vlad, Suzanne_Taylor, madi, Liam, Bill_Kasdorf,
           Frederick_Hirsch

    Regrets
           TomDN

    Chair
           Markus

    Scribe
           Tzviya

Contents

      * [3]Topics
        [4]latinreq
      * [5]Summary of Action Items
      __________________________________________________________

    <trackbot> Date: 06 January 2014

    <Pdanet> tnx Ivan, and, BTW, Hny 2014. I thought it was now,
    5:00 PM is difficult for me today but Luc will be there

    <ivan> Scribe: Tzviya

    <scribe> scribe: tzviya

    <ivan> Guest: Julie Morris, BISG

    markus: minutes from previous meeting approved

    minutes:
    [6]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013De
    c/0042.html

       [6] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013Dec/0042.html

    ivan: announcements
    ... madi solomon has decided to step down as co-chair because
    of changes at Pearson
    ... Liza Daly is taking over as co-chair

    Liza: thank you

    welcome Liza

    <lizadaly> Hooray!

    Ivan: new members joining group, including Apple
    ... 2 members from Apple David Singer AC rep at W3C
    ... and Casey Dougherty
    ... wekcome Julie Morris as almost member of group from BISG

    <mgylling> css shapes:
    [7]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013No
    v/0088.html

       [7] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013Nov/0088.html

    Julie: look forward to continued participatiion

    Markus: CSS shapes review

    <lizadaly> Page selectors > shapes

    markus: review is due on Jan 7

    azaroth: did a quick read through and sent response to list

    <mgylling> robs review:
    [8]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013De
    c/0049.html

       [8] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013Dec/0049.html

    dave: did not get to over holidays

    dave will look at this afternoon

    scribe: and send note to list if there is anything specific to
    comment on. much is over dave's head (!)

    Alan: no need to collate Dave + Rob's comments

    markus: is there any area in particular to pay attention to?

    alan: CSS WG looking to this groups experience with text wrap
    to see if anything missed

    <scribe> ACTION: dave to review CSS shapes and respond to CSS
    WG [recorded in
    [9]http://www.w3.org/2014/01/06-dpub-minutes.html#action01]

    <trackbot> Created ACTION-15 - Review css shapes and respond to
    css wg [on Dave Cramer - due 2014-01-13].

    markus: next time we get request like this, plan further in
    advance

    dave: different requests will generate different levels of
    interest. Will vary by subject matter

latinreq

    <astearns> dauwhe: it may be more useful to read through the
    current editor's draft which includes some changes based on
    last call comments

    <astearns> [10]http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-shapes/

      [10] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-shapes/

    markus: a few replies to dave's request for critical areas, but
    up to dave to take it from here

    Dave: work has been progressing slowly on the document
    ... recent changes have been a section on drop caps and raised
    caps

    <ivan> [11]latest version of Dave's document

      [11] http://w3c.github.io/dpub-pagination/

    Dave: that made me think of questions some of us have in ebook
    production
    ... drop caps are common in print, and many of try to use them
    in ebook
    ... drop caps are tricky in CSS - top needs to align with
    character top. Raised cap needs to base align with other
    characters
    ... In CSS, we encode number of lines and floats
    ... this seems to be an area where the calculation should be
    done for us
    ... would be nice if rendering agent could do calculation of
    line heights and different fonts for us

    Markus: isn't this a perfect example of the kind of thing that
    we'd like to see?

    Dave: yes

    Brady: is this as specific as we want drop caps? or more
    specific units?

    Dave: been thinking about that. Shifting from print to digital
    includes shifting ways of measuring

    <Zakim> liam, you wanted to address brady's question

    Dave: part of me thinks that shorthand "make this a drop-cap"
    would be useful, but I'm not sure

    <Bill_Kasdorf> yes I'm in LUX on Skype

    <lizadaly> We already do have :first-letter in CSS already

    Liam: been through desire for drop caps with CSS WG in past.
    They said just multiply by 3. We need to be clear and precise

    markus: what else going on in the document?

    dave: footnotes - collecting use cases of footnotes and where
    displayed

    <ivan> [12]footnotes' section

      [12] http://w3c.github.io/dpub-pagination/#footnotes

    dave: getting a sense of properties that satisfy most users'
    needs
    ... this seems like a good way to collect info about what
    should be happening

    tzviya: how much of this needs to be preserved in ebooks? a lot
    of this is done to save paper

    dave: print is in scope for this
    ... is the popup something we all agree upon?

    tzviya: no, in academic works, there needs to be a method for
    citation, which would be more difficult with pop-ups

    Bill: perhaps we should abandon the term "footnote" in favor of
    "note" so that we don't indicate location on page
    ... do we have a method for indicating priority? Many of the
    samples discussed on the list are very rare

    Luc: as soon as we decide to display on 2-dimensional area
    (page), we have concerns about quality
    ... most of the time in reflowable view, we have to cope with
    horizontal display. Must address quality of rendering. If we
    can address notes in semantic way - make them appear when
    needed
    ... then we remove the problem of quality

    <Zakim> liam, you wanted to note pop-ups may also have
    accessibility difficulties

    dave: one of aims of this document is to describe rendering

    Liam: the nature of a footnote is that it is not distracting.
    Pop-ups could present a challenge to that. Could be a problem
    for accessibility as well. Keep in mind.

    Brady: I often miss note references in paper books. There is a
    risk of this happening with pop-ups as well.

    Luc: Semantics should enable a subtle reference

    Dave: we've experimented with larger note refs and similar.
    There are many kinds of notes. Footnote may be used as
    shorthand for endnotes and many other kinds of notes

    markus: in case of whether or not want pop-ups, there is
    connection to behavioral adaptive content as well as
    personalization
    ... it seems that dave wanted to identify low-hanging fruit

    Rob: annotations also play into notes space

    Markus: should we look at suggestions provided on list?

    <ivan> [13]luc's email

      [13] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2014Jan/0002.html

    Dave: Luc addressed text justification and composition rules
    ... we all know good layout when we see it, but what is it?

    <JeanK> +1

    Dave: do we or some other group need to more formally describe
    how justification should work?

    <astearns>
    [14]http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/#text-justify-property is
    all we have today in CSS for justification language specifics

      [14] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/#text-justify-property

    Luc: there are algorithms that define how spacing should work
    ... for example, see InDesign paragraph composition algorithm
    that checks spacing and repetition is correct

    Ivan: please define composition engine

    Luc: computes horizontal spacing between words
    ... good distribution between spaces and word
    ... priority is hyphenation and vertical justification

    Dave: yes, we all read ebooks in which an H1 is last item on
    page

    Bill: hyphenation is rarely mentioned without justification
    (H&J)
    ... the two work in tandem - adjust spacing when add a hyphen

    <astearns> hyphenation is also useful in ragged text, for
    reducing line length variation

    <Zakim> liam, you wanted to mention recent CSS change to
    improve line-breaking

    brady: can't really do hyphenation with justification

    Liam: having done some work on line breaking a few years, i
    have a proposal for CSS WG
    ... a property to indicate whether a line break is for
    interactive use or batch use
    ... when add a line of text, the content might move around

    <Luc> +1

    Liam: second property allows you to specify the name of line
    breaking algorithm and parsing parameters
    ... this will likely be accepted by CSS WG

    <JeanK> [15]http://webtypography.net/intro/

      [15] http://webtypography.net/intro/

    Jean: dave asked whether these are in use

    <JeanK>
    [16]http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2013/05/17/typographic-desi
    gn-patterns-practices-case-study-2013/

      [16] 
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2013/05/17/typographic-design-patterns-practices-case-study-2013/

    Jean: Some have attempted to bring Robert Bringhurst's work to
    the web (see Jean's links above)
    ... A lot of composition that is done in XML are doing
    transformations to older languages, TEX and others
    ... people on web are paying attention to this. See
    typeface.js, kerning.js and others
    ... it would be worth our time to look at some of the resources
    available - will provide links

    <JeanK> [17]http://kerningjs.com/

      [17] http://kerningjs.com/

    markus: before we move beyond hyphenation, what is your
    takeaway, Dave?

    <liam> s/TEK/TeX/

    <JeanK> [18]http://letteringjs.com/

      [18] http://letteringjs.com/

    dave: there is a lot of energy and dissatisfaction. We need to
    continue to look at this

    <Bill_Kasdorf> not TeX?

    <JeanK> [19]http://typeface.neocracy.org/

      [19] http://typeface.neocracy.org/

    ivan: another area that bothers me as a reader
    ... that is where hyphenation occurs - the line breaks are in
    the wrong location. The words break so that they look like
    other words

    <JeanK> [20]http://fittextjs.com/

      [20] http://fittextjs.com/

    dave: the quality of the justification is based on the quality
    of the justification dictionary

    <Zakim> liam, you wanted to note difference between unattended
    and attended formatting

    liam: traditional print assumes that an editor will check the
    hyphenation
    ... when there us dynamic hyphenation in place, must ise good
    algorithm

    <JeanK> [21]http://artequalswork.com/posts/on-widows.php

      [21] http://artequalswork.com/posts/on-widows.php

    Luc: the question of the language of the text is a main issue
    of accessibility

    Dave: another issue is image sizing and relationship of caption
    to image
    ... some reading systems did not assume the need to see a whole
    image
    ... important use case is need to keep image and caption
    together
    ... as increase font size, how much should image be allowed to
    decrease?

    markus: Koji mentioned in tokyo that Kobo wanted to exclude
    captions from font adjustments to help avoid this problem

    dave: will be a large number of issues around tables
    ... ben has done a lot of research around tables. Even simple
    areas such simple areas as aligning on decimal is important

    Markus: we spoke about involving alan and adobe in this
    document especially in area of advanced adaptive layout

    alan: not yet, will discuss with colleagues

    markus: what is timeline for first public draft?

    dave: still seems early for that. Nothing on tables yet.. Not
    much on images yet

    ivan: a published draft may include place holders
    ... would the sections that have meat be improved by public
    review and comments?

    dave: I'm fine with public comments as long as people know this
    is a work in progress
    ... especially areas like drop caps

    <JeanK> +1

    markus: 2 of task forces are closer to publicizing something -
    this group and annotations
    ... what should we do next week?
    ... we could continue with this, but I think we should go a
    full round?

    <astearns> (had to drop for another meeting)

    <Luc> +1

    Jean: I think we should stick with this subject
    ... there's a whole group of people we haven't spoken to, font
    people, web typography

    dave: I would love to get contributions from the front lines of
    web typography

    <Luc> Me too

    ivan: that is why pushing out the doc as soon as possible is a
    good idea

    jean: my concern about pushing this out too early is that it
    will look like an incomplete document and it will reflect badly

    ivan: it will look like a working draft

    markus: we need to know who these organizations are. can you
    (Jean) help?

    jean: many of us will be at the ebook hack over weekend and
    digital book world next week

    markus: should we do another task force or continue with this
    next week?

    <JeanK> Start here... : [22]http://tdc.org/

      [22] http://tdc.org/

    dave: It seems there is pent up demand to continue

    markus: is DBW on Monday? Who will be able to attend?

    next meeting on Monday 13 Jan

Summary of Action Items

    [NEW] ACTION: dave to review CSS shapes and respond to CSS WG
    [recorded in
    [23]http://www.w3.org/2014/01/06-dpub-minutes.html#action01]

    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [24]scribe.perl version
     1.138 ([25]CVS log)
     $Date: 2014-01-07 18:34:00 $
      __________________________________________________________

      [24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
      [25] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

    [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11
Check for newer version at [26]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/

      [26] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/(?),/AC/
Succeeded: s/shaped/shapes/
Succeeded: s/ref/wrap/
Succeeded: s/say/said/
Succeeded: s/emails/email/
FAILED: s/TEK/TeK/
Succeeded: s/TeK/TeX/
Succeeded: s/us/is/
Found Scribe: Tzviya
Inferring ScribeNick: tzviya
Found Scribe: tzviya
Inferring ScribeNick: tzviya
Default Present: Liza, +33.1.41.23.aaaa, Ivan, dauwhe, mgylling, Tzviya,
  laudrain, azaroth, fjh, +1.347.633.aabb, benjaminsko, Stearns, duga, gc
apiel, JeanKaplansky, Laura_Fowler, tmichel, Vlad, Suzanne_Taylor, madi,
  Liam, Bill_Kasdorf
Present: Liza +33.1.41.23.aaaa Ivan dauwhe mgylling Tzviya laudrain azar
oth fjh +1.347.633.aabb benjaminsko Stearns duga gcapiel JeanKaplansky L
aura_Fowler tmichel Vlad Suzanne_Taylor madi Liam Bill_Kasdorf Frederick
_Hirsch
Regrets: TomDN

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 06 Jan 2014
Guessing minutes URL: [27]http://www.w3.org/2014/01/06-dpub-minutes.html
People with action items: dave

      [27] http://www.w3.org/2014/01/06-dpub-minutes.html


    [End of [28]scribe.perl diagnostic output]

      [28] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm

Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 18:47:05 UTC