Re: DPUB Interest Group | Accessibility review of Open Annotations - Action Item

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Suzanne Taylor
<suzanne.taylor@pearson.com>wrote:

>  Quote: In Anno-Specific-4 (Annotating Embedded Resources), I added
> bullet three under "Requirements":
>
>    - Ability to select all or part of alternative versions of resources
>    (i.e. some portion of the alternative text) and have these exposed without
>    assistive technology to those who read the comments.
>
> Rob's Comment: I think this is fundamental enough that it deserves its own
> separate use case? The functionality of annotating an image, versus the
> functionality of annotating the alt-text of an image seems quite distinct
> to me?
>
> Suzanne's Comment: I agree, do you want me to write it, or will you write
> it?
>


I'm happy to take first hack at it and will pass it over to you by the COB
(Mountain) today?

R




>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Robert Sanderson [mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 06, 2014 10:46 AM
> *To:* Suzanne Taylor
> *Cc:* Richard Schwerdtfeger; Gerardo Capiel; George Kerscher; Markus
> Gylling; Thea Eaton; W3C Digital Publishing IG
>
> *Subject:* Re: DPUB Interest Group | Accessibility review of Open
> Annotations - Action Item
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Suzanne, all,
>
>
>
> Thanks so much for doing that! :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Suzanne Taylor <suzanne.taylor@pearson.com>
> wrote:
>
> Under Social Reading and Annotations > Other Use Cases, I added 2 new use
> cases related to accessibility:
>
>    - Making sure the annotations can be found:
>    https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Anno_A11y_1
>
>   Mostly implementation guidelines, rather than requiring any particular
> feature in the model/vocabulary/serialization I think, but very important!
>
>
>
>
>    - Making sure the annotations can be categorized:
>    https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Anno_A11y_2
>
>   Whereas this one requires a slot in the model for the label.
>  Categorization (or tagging) of annotations has been discussed in the OACG,
> and there are several ways to accomplish it.  The easiest is a property on
> the annotation, body or specific resource (in order of ease).  The more
> systematic and interoperable way is to annotate the annotation with the
> category in the manner of tagging any other resource.
>
>
>
>
>
>   In Anno-Specific-2 (Highlighting a Span of Text) and Anno-Specific-3
> (Commenting on a Span of Text), under dependencies, I added links to
> "Making sure the annotations can be found":
> https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Anno_A11y_1 and to the longer use case
> from the accessibility section.
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>   In Anno-Advanced-3 (Maintaining Annotation Style), under dependencies,
> I added links to "Making sure the annotations can be categorized":
> https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Anno_A11y_2  and to the longer use case
> from the accessibility section.
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
>   In Anno-Specific-4 (Annotating Embedded Resources), I added bullet
> three under "Requirements":
>
>    - Ability to select all or part of alternative versions of resources
>    (i.e. some portion of the alternative text) and have these exposed without
>    assistive technology to those who read the comments.
>
>   I think this is fundamental enough that it deserves its own separate
> use case? The functionality of annotating an image, versus the
> functionality of annotating the alt-text of an image seems quite distinct
> to me?
>
>
>
>   In Anno-Specific-5 (Annotating Parts of Embedded Resources), I added
> bullet three under "Requirements":
>
>    - High level semantic description of the part (i.e. 'user selected
>    portion of this image') and ability for the annotator to name the part
>    (i.e. 'the oak tree')
>
>   +1 (and see comments above about categorization/tagging)
>
>
>
>   In Anno-Advanced-6 (Recording State of User Manipulated Resources), I
> added bullet three under "Requirements":
>
>    - Ability for the annotator to name the state (i.e. 'view from
>    underground looking up at the tree roots')
>
>   And +1 again :)
>
>
>
> Many thanks Suzanne and Rich!
>
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
>