W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > November 2013

Re: The AAP EPUB 3 Implementation Project

From: Cramer, Dave <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:23:58 -0500
To: Jean Kaplansky <Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Gerardo Capiel <gerardoc@benetech.org>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, W3C Public Digital Publishing IG Mailing List <public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CEA000D4.40B0C%david.cramer@hbgusa.com>
On 11/6/13 10:39 AM, "Jean Kaplansky" <Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com<mailto:Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com>> wrote:

Dear Digital Publishing Interest Group -

Are these on-the-go math conversations something you want to see continue on this list, or should we take this off line and then come back to the group with use cases?

I ask because I think we can keep the conversation about MathML, MathJax, and Accessibility going in great detail, but I certainly donít want to hijack the W3 DPUB threads for this purpose if we should take the conversation off line.

I'm in favor of everything staying on the mailing list, as it's more transparent, and even though some of us may not contribute much to a particular subject, we may want to keep up with the discussion.

I think the CSS Working Group's approach could work, using [subject lines] to allow users to filter discussions. We can have [pagination], [mathml], etc.



This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network.
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 19:24:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:35:46 UTC