Re: Overarching scope of the DPUB; Was re: Pagination ED, 28 October 2013

On Mon, November 11, 2013 6:32 pm, Jean Kaplansky wrote:
...
> My bad… I was still in shock at seeing S1000D in a business email since
> 2011 when I was working at PTC. :)

My bad… I mentioned S1000D partly because it's a well-known example of a
publication type that won't be satisfied with strings in 16 pre-defined
slots around the page [1] and partly because, from the outside looking in,
it's hard to tell whether something like S1000D would ever be in scope for
CSS, DPIG, or the OWP, and vice-versa [2].

Regards,


Tony Graham                                   tgraham@mentea.net
Consultant                                 http://www.mentea.net
Mentea       13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland
 --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --
    XML, XSL-FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming
       Chair, Print and Page Layout Community Group @ W3C

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-page/#margin-boxes
[2]
http://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/archives/201311/msg00066.html

Received on Monday, 11 November 2013 21:06:44 UTC