Re: [EXT] did:webs vs did:tdw

VERY interested in did:tdw, particularly after Stephan’s presentation and associated conversations at DICE. It is also on the technical roadmap for the Swiss E-ID implementation for some very rational reasons.

It looks to have rather important functionality that (key rotation etc) looks to be compelling for enterprise usage.

Couple of things I am interested in understanding are:


  1.  Is there a core subset of functionality available to did:tdw, that may make sense to be incorporated into the core DID spec so that it becomes available to all DID methods?
  2.  Is there functionality that could be integrated into did:web itself? It plays well with the existing did:web, so could the DID log file functionality that is provided by did:tdw be an optional aspect of did:web? (An implementer could then profile that to be a requirement if they so choose?)

In is great to see the energy coming into the DID work!


Best Regards,



Anil



Anil John

US Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC, USA


Currently Mobile. Expect Brevity.



This document contains pre-decisional and/or deliberative process information exempt from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5). Do not release without prior approval of the Department of Homeland Security.

________________________________