- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:54:22 -0400
- To: W3C DID Working Group <public-did-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Julien Fraichot <julien.fraichot@hyland.com>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:26 AM Julien Fraichot <Julien.Fraichot@hyland.com> wrote: > At recent DICE in Zürich Stephen Curran presented the did:tdw spec. > Trying to wrap my head around the differences with did:webs, it seems did:tdw borrows a lot of concepts from the latter. > From what I’ve gathered so far, the main difference is that did:webs relies on KERI while did:tdw does not. Is that the only notable difference? IIUC, there is a lot of conceptual overlap, yes. I believe there are a number of us that are interested in moving the concepts in did:tdw forward into some sort of production deployment. > I’m aware of the xkcd joke and the 196 did specs out there, so I’m trying to break down a sort of comparison table to facilitate decision making, at least between these 2 specs. That would be a useful thing for the community. I'm also having a hard time understanding ALL of the differences between did:web, did:webs, and did:tdw (other than the KERI one). -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Monday, 24 June 2024 13:55:02 UTC