Re: Updating the DID method registry

Thanks Markus, and yes, we are members of the DID WG, thought it best to ask the registry first. 

I just find it odd that the W3C would allow, or even encourage, squatters. What prevents us, or anyone, from doing this at all of the blockchains as they are created (other than my ethos)? 

When our team brought it up a the DID WG, it was deferred and we were told to just use a different method name, which is what we will have to do as no W3C group is willing to tackle this problem.

Thanks.

- - -
Phillip Shoemaker
Executive Director, Identity
E: phillip@identity.org
M: 1.408.835.8444



> On Jun 7, 2024, at 10:12 AM, Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com> wrote:
> 
> Phillip,
> 
> I agree with Kevin that the new DID WG can discuss this, perhaps you are interested in joining?
> https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/did/
> 
> I don't think it's realistic in the short term that an existing entry will be removed or replaced, since as Kevin pointed out there isn't really a process for that (except if the original submitter requests a change).
> 
> Would you maybe consider using a different method name..?
> 
> Markus
> 
> On 6/7/24 18:30, Phillip Shoemaker wrote:
>> Thanks Kevin, I completely agree. And if the DID method was deployed and maintained, I wouldn’t be asking this question. We are working with BNB on this and cannot deploy as is. 
>> - Never deployed
>> - Nothing to maintain
>> - Company is non-responsive and their GitHub is not touched in years
>> 
>>> No deployment -> Deprecate immediately
>> 
>> 
>> How do we get to the above? 
>> 
>> 
>> - - -
>> Phillip Shoemaker
>> Executive Director, Identity
>> E: phillip@identity.org <mailto:phillip@identity.org>
>> M: 1.408.835.8444
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 7, 2024, at 6:52 AM, Kevin Dean <kevin@legreq.com> <mailto:kevin@legreq.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Name collision is a problem for DID methods. As with domain names, it’s a case of “first one in wins”. Unlike domain names, though, where failure to renew registration eventually returns the name to the free pool, there’s no mechanism for deprecation in the DID registry.
>>> 
>>> Even if there were, it’s problematic, because DIDs can outlast support for their underlying methods. Suppose someone needs to query a DID sometime in the future in order to validate some present-day action, and they have previously had no exposure to the DID. The logical place to start would be the DID registry, but if the DID registry has a different, unrelated specification linked to the DID method name, they will be unable to perform the validation. Arguably, they could go through the GitHub history to determine what version of the JSON file applied at the time of the present-day action they’re validating, but that introduces a new, non-standard level of indirection to DID processing.
>>> 
>>> This is analogous to sending an email to a reallocated domain: it might get through, but it certainly won’t be to the intended recipient.
>>> 
>>> In my opinion, DID method name deprecation should be taken up in the new working group. I’ve been through something similar in another domain, and it led to a tiered approach:
>>> 
>>> No deployment -> Deprecate immediately
>>> Limited deployment (e.g., for proof of concept) -> Deprecate after well-defined period (e.g., one year)
>>> Production deployment -> Never deprecate
>>> From: Phillip Shoemaker <phillip@identity.org> <mailto:phillip@identity.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 7:52:19 PM
>>> To: public-did-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-did-wg@w3.org> <public-did-wg@w3.org> <mailto:public-did-wg@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Updating the DID method registry
>>>  
>>> How does one go about getting the DID method registry updated?
>>> 
>>> We wish to deploy a DID method on BNB, but a company named Ontology has already registered it a few years ago, and still have not deployed a method. Additionally, they did not list their website nor an email address. I’ve tried for months to contact the company to no avail.
>>> 
>>> What is the process to update the registry?
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> - - -
>>> Phillip Shoemaker
>>> Executive Director, Identity
>>> E: phillip@identity.org <mailto:phillip@identity.org>
>>> M: 1.408.835.8444
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>