- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:14:00 -0400
- To: Ryan Grant <w3c@rgrant.org>
- Cc: W3C DID Working Group <public-did-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 2:40 PM Ryan Grant <w3c@rgrant.org> wrote: > The DID-WG, constrained to using the W3C consensus > process, and also explicitly constrained from working on DID Methods > under its current charter, cannot "help other groups standardize DID > Methods", except by relinquishing its own time for participants in > other meetings who may find a non-conflicting schedule convenient. That was merely my personal suggestion, which is what that deck should be interpreted as for now, as an example of what we could do. It was a suggestion to "help others be successful and align with our work in the DID WG"... not to do any "official DID standardization activities within the DID WG", which as you stated, is not within the remit of our charter. For example, if another group asks the DID WG to do a review on their specification that they are standardizing elsewhere, volunteers from the DID WG could step forward to do that review and say whether or not it conforms to DID Core. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Monday, 8 July 2024 19:14:40 UTC