- From: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 23:33:26 +0200
- To: Kyano Kashi <kyanokashi2@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-did-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACU_chkbZ0n14jG79r=-ZddEN0aA882FZZRrXgKpysbeypFXcQ@mail.gmail.com>
The DID WG isn't quite the right place for this question; you may want the VC working group instead. However, the groups overlap, so I'll try to provide a helpful response. You've touched on a topic that's a bit sensitive, because within this community there are strongly divergent opinions about the reality of this use case, the best way to address it (if at all), and so forth. If you want to know more about the arguments against a ZK approach, perhaps talk to Dave Longley, who has articulated some principled concerns. If you want to know more about those who are doing things like this, perhaps talk to the Hyperledger Indy community. Both parties will be able to give you much more detailed info. --Daniel On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:27 PM Kyano Kashi <kyanokashi2@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey everyone! > > Is anyone focused on ZK verfication of Issuer claims? > > For example, assume a VC representing a government ID. A person goes to a > bar and a prover needs to prove to the doorman, the verifier, they’re above > 21. Really the only information the verifier needs to end up with is wether > the prover is above 21 or not. They shouldn’t have access to their exact > age. > > Is this something that’s actively being discussed / has been implemented? > Would love to know more. > > Best, > > Kyano >
Received on Monday, 12 September 2022 21:33:49 UTC