Re: DID methods registry database?

Sorry, this is the correct URL:
https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/FIfjWl77ZgmGiO8Jd-rlu+Is/



On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 11:15, Dan Bolser <dan@geromics.co.uk> wrote:

> To keep momentum, I've put some 'rough notes' here:
> https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/3/pad/edit/7bb4c36d5a9729a66d6e66fa56e76d9b/
>
> Please feel free to add comments / suggestions / feedback there.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 16:48, Dan Bolser <dan@geromics.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Thanks both,
>>
>> Yes, I don't want to duplicate work!
>>
>> I'll have to read the above in a bit more detail, after which I can build
>> a prototype for feedback pretty easily.
>>
>> Unfortunately, 'seqwiki' (the paper I linked) has been down for a while.
>> I'm planning to resurrect it, but user accounts are a lingering issue...
>> However, you can look at how it (nearly) works here:
>> http://116.203.158.69/wiki/Software
>>
>> e.g.
>> http://116.203.158.69/wiki/Special:BrowseData
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 15:37, Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> I was thinking of doing the same thing! (Except was still at the phase
>>> of pondering which tool stack to use.) MediaWiki is a great idea!
>>> As Manu mentions, there IS already the DID Methods Registry. However, it
>>> is a static markdown table, and it would be very interesting and useful to
>>> actually use a database as a backend. (And to expand the fields used for
>>> tracking and classifying the methods.)
>>>
>>> Here are the fields I would like to see, to start with:
>>>
>>> (Fields from the DID Registry)
>>> * Method name
>>> * Link to method spec
>>> * Authors
>>> * (Spec) Status (provisional/deprecated etc)
>>> * Persistence mechanism (DLT or Network column)
>>>
>>> Other fields:
>>> * Broad persistence category. (Ledger [public permissionless, public
>>> permissioned, private, etc] vs DHT vs Local/Peer vs Other).
>>> * Number of implementations
>>> * DID Core features supported (proof purposes, service endpoints, etc)
>>> * Other / custom features supported
>>> * Key algorithms supported (ed25519, rsa, etc)
>>> * Cost of DID Document creation/registering
>>> * Cost of DID Document update (key rotation etc)
>>>
>>> In addition, I think it would be interesting to go through the
>>> (forthcoming) DID Method Rubrics
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rYdWiwawWmLOWtHRvT0GzYcdewW_OS9M2mAkENLFdtY/edit>
>>> document, to see which fields from there it would make sense to add to the
>>> db.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:04 AM Dan Bolser <dan@geromics.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've been thinking of building a registries database using Semantic
>>>> MediaWiki. It's kind of my favorite hammer / toy [1].
>>>>
>>>> What fields would people expect to see for a did-method?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks, Dan
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3245082/
>>>>
>>>