W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-did-wg@w3.org > August 2020

Re: DID WG Special Topic Call (Service Endpoints)

From: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:26:34 -0600
Message-ID: <CAFBYrUp=H=vKcm-r3shzSbrvAmXxwB6J2c-LFKf7MiWVs_pfFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C DID Working Group <public-did-wg@w3.org>
This answer assumes that learning of B's existence and learning how to talk
to B are the same thing. They may coincide sometimes, but there is no
guarantee that they always will. We know they do not, sometimes.

This answer also assumes that the channel over which you engage with B is
duplex, such that the channel to reply is the channel to receive. Again,
another assumption that's not always true.

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:13 PM Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>

> On 8/27/20 12:08 PM, Daniel Hardman wrote:
> >     Yes, agreed, I expect this will be the most undesirable option to
> most.
> >     The counter-point is that everyone *is* doing some form of DID Auth
> now,
> >     and even if it's not officially standardized, we are able to get VCs
> >     from point A to point B today.
> >
> >
> > How do you get VCs from A to B if you don't know how to contact B?
> This is a good question and, if we go even further back, we might find
> an answer:
> How do you even know B to begin with?
> One option for getting VCs from A to B is to reuse the same channel from
> which you learned B in the first place.
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2020 19:26:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:27:50 UTC