Re: DID WG Special Topic Call

Just to provide some context for the call:

- Discussion about this topic during the F2F in Amsterdam:
https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2020-01-31-did#section6

- Current preliminary PRs on DID Core that propose some content about
DID Resolution architecture and contracts:
https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/247 (by myself)
https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/253 (by Justin Richer)

- One proposal how to organize metadata:
https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/65#issuecomment-597030882

- Some slides I presented a few weeks ago, about the potential
relationship between a DID Core and DID Resolution spec:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ccnbh_A53yzTyIIrw6ol_EakAliuo3MfxIFlGsaoKos/

Markus

On 4/11/20 6:03 AM, Brent Zundel wrote:
> Greetings DID WG Participants,
>
> We are holding an additional call on Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 12 PM
> EDT.
>
> We will be using our standard DID WG Zoom room [1].
>
> We will use the call to discuss DID Resolution in all its glory. 
> Please join us if you would like to help answer such questions as (for
> example): 
>
>   * How should DID Resolution relate to the DID Core spec? 
>   * Should we define a resolution contract?
>   * Can we discuss resolution before covering metadata (which one is
>     the cart, and which the horse)?
>   * What does the charter say about resolution, and what does what it
>     says mean?
>   * How normative can we be about this, really; I mean, y'know?
>
>
> Thank you for your commitment to this work. We cannot move forward
> without your input and encourage you to attend these additional
> meetings as your schedules permit.
>
>
> The DID WG Chairs,
> Dan Burnett
> Brent Zundel
>
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-did-wg/2020Mar/0004.html