- From: Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 08:28:17 -0800
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: W3C Devices and Sensors WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK-EfX=aWU3Y8p+mq397sHXKSHB8HWfB+CddXPE2g=Gd=9EVLw@mail.gmail.com>
Sounds as if they're valuable, and I can work an email filter, so carry on. ;) On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:22 AM Kostiainen, Anssi < anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi All, Vincent, > > I understand Vincent watches GitHub repos of interest to him so from his > perspective digests are noise. This is what I consider to be a typical work > mode for an active contributor. To immediately salvage this situation, I > propose setting up a filter in the mail client. As a bonus, if digests are > a global issue, one filter will fix them all. > > OTOH, I'm also aware of participants who are not watching (all) the repos > but still want to get a summary of active discussions in the group once in > a while (reactive or monitoring participants). The digests are a solution > that serves this audience. When folks join the group they'll get digests > automatically without needing to do any extra work. It might be those are > the only signals they get. We want to be inclusive of both the groups' > needs and as such whatever tooling we put in place will always have to make > some compromises, I'm afraid. > > There's one interesting benefit in digests that is useful when you have to > do archeology: digests leave a chronological paper trail of the group's GH > issue and PR activity in > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/ that can be > useful at times for editors and chairs in particular. I can still read > archived mails sent to the lists in the 90s. > > Unless more people feel strongly about the issue, I'd prefer to keep the > current setup in place for the time being, and let active contributors > filter out digests at their end. > > Sounds reasonable? > > Thanks, > > -Anssi (DAS WG co-chair) > > On 11. Feb 2020, at 2.38, Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi Vincent, > > These emails were sent via github-notify-ml-config[1], and many groups are > using it[2]. If many people in this group find it noisy, I can turn it off > or create a separate mailing list specifically for receiving digest emails. > > (Personally, I never read digest emails before, but as my GitHub emails > becoming more and more, I found that digest emails were easier to find out > what issue/PR I would like to read/comment, so I have started to read them > now.) > > Thanks, > > Fuqiao > > Footnotes: > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config > [2] https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config/blob/master/mls.json > > On Feb 11, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com> wrote: > > Does anyone use the public-device-apis "Weekly github digest" emails? > > From my perspective they are just noise. Anyone needing to monitor github > activity can manage their own reminder (via calendar, etc) and go to github > directly. > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2020 16:28:47 UTC