- From: Lin, Wanming <wanming.lin@intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:20:44 +0000
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, "W3C Devices and Sensors WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi, Anssi > * There are no web-platform-tests [4] for Wake Lock API. It is strongly > recommended to ship at minimum a preliminary test suite along with a CR spec. > Blink's tests could be potentially used as a starting point, but would need to be > reworked to align with the latest spec. I am the volunteer. I will start to create the test suite with Web IDL tests. Of cause, other contributions are encouraged.:-) Thanks, Wanming > -----Original Message----- > From: Kostiainen, Anssi [mailto:anssi.kostiainen@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 3:27 PM > To: W3C Devices and Sensors WG <public-device-apis@w3.org> > Subject: [wake-lock] Candidate Rec blockers > > Hi, > > At our latest teleconference, we charted a plan [1] to transition Wake Lock API > [2] to Candidate Recommendation. > > Looking into this, I have identified two issues for which we need clarity on prior > to asking for a transition to CR, in particular, with respect to the following > transition requirement [3]: > > [[ > > * must document how adequate implementation experience will be > demonstrated > > ]] > > The issues identified are the following: > > * There are no web-platform-tests [4] for Wake Lock API. It is strongly > recommended to ship at minimum a preliminary test suite along with a CR spec. > Blink's tests could be potentially used as a starting point, but would need to be > reworked to align with the latest spec. > > * The only known implementation [5] is based on an earlier version of the > specification. The specification was since reworked substantially and the > implementation is no longer aligned. We'd need to demonstrate these changes > are implementable, or that they will not cause difficulty of implementation. > > We're looking for volunteers to help with the above-mentioned tasks to allow > the Wake Lock API spec to advance to CR. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi (Device and Sensors Working Group Chair) > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/10/05-dap-minutes.html#action03 > [2] https://w3c.github.io/wake-lock/ > [3] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#candidate-rec > [4] https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/ > [5] https://crbug.com/257511 >
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2017 10:21:13 UTC