- From: Menard, Alexis <alexis.menard@intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:19:59 +0000
- To: Felipe Nascimento de Moura <felipenmoura@gmail.com>
- CC: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A679E574-C0BD-4785-B376-24F4375904D8@intel.com>
Hi, The fact also that it doesn’t depends on navigator is I believe so that it can address JavaScript environments where navigator is not available, think of NodeJS in an IoT world. This is typically a place where your NodeJS app will query the sensors on the board and do something with it. Depending on the DOM is also not really an option. Thanks. On Nov 25, 2016, at 5:48 AM, Felipe Nascimento de Moura <felipenmoura@gmail.com<mailto:felipenmoura@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi. Reading this e-mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2016Nov/0024.html I could add now, yet a new different pattern to the list I showed in the first e-mail: ``` let sensor = new Magnetometer(); // new instance of a global Constructor sensor.start(); sensor.onchange = function(event) { ... }; ``` I think this is the moment for us to think about a `core` for sensors, like `navigator.sensors....` :) On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Felipe Nascimento de Moura <felipenmoura@gmail.com<mailto:felipenmoura@gmail.com>> wrote: > https://github.com/w3c/sensors ... some are already supported in Chrome ;) nice, I have already done some tests with the currently supported ones, but even though, I think an aggregator for all the sensors is very important. Even for hacking and discoverability. navigator.sensors.tirePressure().then( ... ) Actually, navigator.sensors could even have a "getter" for any method that does not exist to return a rejected promise, instead of a "undefined is not a function" error. This way, calling `navigator.sensors.anInexistingSensor().then(...).catch(...)` would reject until the sensors was created or supported. Thinking it further, we could even have a `navigator.sensors.create` with a pattern for developers to create their own sensors based in other information...let's say: ``` navigator.sensors.create("darkRoom", function(mySensor){ Promise.all([ navigator.sensors.light(), navigator.sensors.proximity() ]).then(function([lightSensor, proximitySensor]){ // combine lightSensor and proximity to identify when the room is dark // and the device is not inside a pocket, for example // you can dispatch events here on mySensor }); }); // then, afterwards navigator.sensors.darkRoom().then(darkRoomSensor=>{ darkRoomSensor.addEventListener(...); }); ``` Did I go too far? :p On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com<mailto:marcos@marcosc.com>> wrote: On November 24, 2016 at 3:41:07 PM, Felipe Nascimento de Moura (felipenmoura@gmail.com<mailto:felipenmoura@gmail.com>) wrote: > I think I should be able to type "navigator.sensors" in my console and see > even an autocomplete with the possibilities. https://github.com/w3c/sensors ... some are already supported in Chrome ;) -- [ ]s -- Felipe N. Moura Web Developer, Google Developer Expert<https://developers.google.com/experts/people/felipe-moura>, Founder of BrazilJS<https://braziljs.org/> and Nasc<http://nasc.io/>. Website: http://felipenmoura.com<http://felipenmoura.com/> / http://nasc.io/ Twitter: @felipenmoura<http://twitter.com/felipenmoura> Facebook: http://fb.com/felipenmoura LinkedIn: http://goo.gl/qGmq --------------------------------- Changing the world is the least I expect from myself! -- [ ]s -- Felipe N. Moura Web Developer, Google Developer Expert<https://developers.google.com/experts/people/felipe-moura>, Founder of BrazilJS<https://braziljs.org/> and Nasc<http://nasc.io/>. Website: http://felipenmoura.com<http://felipenmoura.com/> / http://nasc.io/ Twitter: @felipenmoura<http://twitter.com/felipenmoura> Facebook: http://fb.com/felipenmoura LinkedIn: http://goo.gl/qGmq --------------------------------- Changing the world is the least I expect from myself!
Received on Monday, 28 November 2016 22:20:36 UTC