- From: Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 15:34:31 +0000
- To: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- Cc: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 31 January 2016 15:35:00 UTC
> > Re-read the specification, I think both the 2 implementations are > compliant with specification, especially for the note "the definition of > how often the chargingtimechange, dischargingtimechange, and levelchange > events are fired is left to the implementation." Then we need to revise the > tests. > > What do you think? > Aside from other questions... It seems that leaving the update frequency to the implementations could somehow allow to fingerprint e.g. the browser and so, possibly, also the user. In this case, is it necessary to consider it in the security and privacy section? Best Lukasz
Received on Sunday, 31 January 2016 15:35:00 UTC