- From: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:33:57 -0500
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>, "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "ms2ger@gmail.com" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
Dom Thanks for the clarification and update on the plans to rework it - it wasn't clear to me whether there was a 'typo' in the message. regards, Frederick > On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > > On 05/01/2016 14:28, Frederick Hirsch wrote: >> Thanks for the update. >> >> One clarification: >> >>> This pull request is no acceptable per Ms2ger and my review. >> >> I assume this should read that the "pull request is now acceptable", correct? > > No, it meant the pull request is NOT acceptable — I need to rework it (which I hope to get to soon). > >> Dom, have you had a chance to review the idlharness pull request? >> >> https://github.com/w3c/testharness.js/pull/161 > > Dom >
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2016 13:34:43 UTC