- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 08:50:06 +0200
- To: "Lukasz Olejnik (W3C)" <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Lukasz, On 18/08/2016 23:27, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) wrote: > I'm just wondering whether [1] will be included? Thanks. > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/vibration/issues/12 >From a process point of view, it can't, since the PER was published without it; we would have to go through another PER review phase to add that additional text. >From a more substantive point of view, I'm personally not convinced that the the threat you describe in [1] is one that is worth highlighting in the privacy considerations; but obviously that's up to the group to decide. If we do decide it needs addressing, there are a variety of options: * following the current PER directly with another PER review * stashing this issue for another round of errata inclusion at a later phase * marking this for inclusion in a v2 of the spec (should we decide there needs to be one) Dom
Received on Friday, 19 August 2016 06:50:10 UTC