- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:13:19 +0100
- To: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>, "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
- Cc: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On 28/08/2015 08:55, Zhang, Zhiqiang wrote: >> I'm wondering whether the testharness.js built-in promise_*() are of any >> help or whether we'd need to patch testharness.js to add support. I'd guess >> testharness.js should be able to properly test functions that return promises. >> jgraham who's the original author of testharness.js was on the Moz bug, >> perhaps he knows. > > Hmm, seems this is a problem of idlharness.js rather than testharness.js, > as the idlharness.js hasn't considered the Promise related tech. I have a pending pull request on idlharness that I think would help (at least a bit) with this: https://github.com/w3c/testharness.js/pull/161 Dom >>>> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1050749#c37 >>>> [2] http://w3c-test.org/battery-status/battery-interface.html
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2015 11:13:29 UTC