- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:19:41 +0100
- To: Mats Wichmann <mats@osg.samsung.com>, public-device-apis@w3.org
On 21/01/2015 14:46, Mats Wichmann wrote: > I haven't seen any reaction to my comment on wake-lock, which was that > while I have no objection to the proposal itself, the use-case document > it references for justification includes a claim that any attempt to > address those issues MUST address at least A and B and our progressing > spec only addresses A. Some realignment ought to happen - which might > be adjusting the use-case doc? I've prepared a pull request in that direction: https://github.com/w3c-webmob/wake-lock-use-cases/pull/27 If my fellow editors agree to it, we could probably get the Web & Mobile IG to re-publish the use cases doc at the same time as we publish the FPWD of wake lock. Dom
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 09:20:01 UTC