- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:31:57 +0000
- To: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- CC: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
> On 28 Aug 2015, at 09:17, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Anssi, > > Thanks for the info. > >> From: Kostiainen, Anssi >> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:33 PM >> To: Zhang, Zhiqiang >> Cc: W3C Device APIs WG >> Subject: [battery] getBattery() test case feedback >> >> Hi Zhiqiang, >> >> Mozilla is revising its Battery Status API implementation to match the latest >> spec and provided some feedback re the test case for getBattery() in Bugzilla >> [1]. > > I've caught an issue report at > https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/2104 Thanks for the point, I had missed this one. >> Do you have a suggestion how to improve that test case? > > But I have no idea at current being how to improve that test. I'm wondering whether the testharness.js built-in promise_*() are of any help or whether we'd need to patch testharness.js to add support. I'd guess testharness.js should be able to properly test functions that return promises. jgraham who's the original author of testharness.js was on the Moz bug, perhaps he knows. Thanks, -Anssi >> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1050749#c37 >> [2] http://w3c-test.org/battery-status/battery-interface.html
Received on Friday, 28 August 2015 06:32:30 UTC