- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:13:08 +0000
- To: public-device-apis@w3.org
OK, if the spec indeed defines abstract classes to be implemented, I agree that it makes sense for it to be on the Rec-track. I think the title could still be improved: "Generic Sensor API" can easily be read that this API lets you access any sensor. I guess this pull request can be closed, and maybe an issue raised on the title? -- GitHub Notif of comment by dontcallmedom See https://github.com/w3c/sensors/pull/54#issuecomment-129784481
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 09:13:10 UTC