- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:56:34 +0100
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Device APIs Working Group <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Improved the "perform vibration" steps: > > http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/#dfn-perform-vibration > > Would "this context" work considering reusability in other contexts? "this context" doesn't really mean anything which is why I suggested to just omit it. We don't really need to be super precise here I think since this seems like an implementation detail (or something implementations can compete on in terms of quality). No need for interoperability. >> (Should navigator.vibrate() be present in workers by the way?) > > The known implementations do not expose this to workers currently. That would require a bit more refactoring. Perhaps that'd be a v2 feature after some experimentation in code first. Fair. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 13:57:01 UTC