Re: Vibration

Hi Anne, FYI Frederick,

> On 19 Nov 2014, at 12:04, Anne van Kesteren <> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi
> <> wrote:
>> I updated the Editor's Draft to provide the following hooks:
> I was thinking of something like this in IDL:
>  typedef (unsigned long or sequence<unsigned long>) VibratePattern;
> So I can refer to that and if we ever decide to allow other arguments
> it would automatically work. Sorry for not being more clear.

Good suggestion, added:

> This looks good.


> This looks good too, except for the first step, which is not really
> applicable for notifications, and even less for notifications from a
> service worker (there's no document). Maybe that step should be
> uplifted to "processing vibration patterns"?

Makes sense, #dfn-perform-vibration updated as proposed.

> Thanks for the quick reply and making this work!

Anne - thanks for the suggestions and review!

Frederick - since these changes are editorial in nature I updated the PR.html snapshot (as well as the PR-diff.html) accordingly, see:;r2=1.4;f=h



Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 11:55:51 UTC