- From: Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:30:00 +0000
- To: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- CC: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Frederick, Anssi, > From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:w3c@fjhirsch.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:06 PM > On Jun 26, 2014, at 1:49 AM, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I once got an ACTION-701 to provide summary of test status and next steps, > here is a draft testing status: > > > > https://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/User:Zqzhang/Test > > it might be helpful to indicate whether there are any items in the "less than 2" > or "complete fail" cases, in the table itself, so we know the overall status. Added. A minor update is to remove "less than 2" and "complete fail" for the actually only one implementation items. While rechecking the failure tests, I reported an issue that total test numbers don't count manual tests at https://github.com/darobin/wptreport/issues/5 .. this affects vibration "less than 2" result :) > For vibration I notice there is one 'fail' for Firefox. What do we have to do to > address this 'fail' - is there an action on someone? I assume once this fail is > addressed then we are done testing Vibration, have two implementations > and could progress toward Recommendation. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1031226 reported for Firefox for Android. > > Many thanks for Anssi's offline review, and we both think that we dedicate > the ImplementationStatus wiki at: > > > > https://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus > > I think you are suggesting we use the table you provided instead of the older > implementationStatus wiki. If so, I think that is a good idea. We can mark the > older wiki page as obsolete and add a link at the top to the new table. Yes, thanks. > > ... for this table for clarity, and move other resources, such as: > > > > > https://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus#Other_Resource > s > > > > ... elsewhere e.g. into its own wiki page. > > > > Agree? > > Agreed Thanks. Anssi, can you help refine the wiki pages? Thanks, Zhiqiang
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 09:30:52 UTC