- From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:59:55 +0200
- To: "'frederick.hirsch@nokia.com'" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, "robin@w3.org" <robin@w3.org>
- CC: "art.barstow@gmail.com" <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "marcos@marcosc.com" <marcos@marcosc.com>, "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "anssi.kostiainen@intel.com" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, "ehsan@mozilla.com" <ehsan@mozilla.com>
+1 Claes Nilsson Master Engineer - Web Research Advanced Application Lab, Technology Sony Mobile Communications Tel: +46 70 55 66 878 claes1.nilsson@sonymobile.com sonymobile.com > -----Original Message----- > From: frederick.hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:frederick.hirsch@nokia.com] > Sent: den 24 juni 2014 18:21 > To: robin@w3.org > Cc: frederick.hirsch@nokia.com; art.barstow@gmail.com; > marcos@marcosc.com; public-web-intents@w3.org; public-device- > apis@w3.org; anssi.kostiainen@intel.com; ehsan@mozilla.com > Subject: Re: [webintents] Should DAP revisit WebIntents? > > +1 > > we have the TF, the list and the IPR obligations of the joint TF. I > suggest we simply use the (awakening) Web Intents task force unless > there is an unstated motivation. > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > @fjhirsch > > > > On Jun 24, 2014, at 11:54 AM, ext Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 24/06/2014 17:52 , Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> Perhaps churn on it in a Community Group and then IFF there are two > >> implementations, then move it to a Working Group? > > > > This sounds to me like it's just pushing things around for no good > > purpose (but perhaps you have a motivation in mind which you didn't > > list!) > > > > I think we have this list, we can work with that. > > > > -- > > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 09:04:59 UTC