Thursday, 24 July 2014
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Friday, 18 July 2014
- Re: Adding Wake Lock to the charter
- Re: Adding Wake Lock to the charter
- Adding Wake Lock to the charter
Tuesday, 15 July 2014
Monday, 14 July 2014
- Re: Vibration test update (Re ACTION-701: DAP testing status)
- Vibration test update (Re ACTION-701: DAP testing status)
Thursday, 10 July 2014
- CfP SAME Workshop@NordiCHI - Pervasive & Smart & Media Usability, Interaction, and Technologies (dealdine 15th Nov), Helsinki
- CfP ACADEMIC MINDTREK (EXTENDED 10/Aug): Academic MindTrek * GAMES, SOCIAL MEDIA, HCI, PERVASIVE MEDIA, eGOVERNMENT, MEDIA MANAGMENT & BUSINESS, HYBRID MEDIA *
- [admin] Cancel DAP Teleconference 10 July 2014
- Re: Call for potential DAP charter additions - please respond by 7 July 2014
Wednesday, 9 July 2014
Saturday, 5 July 2014
Friday, 4 July 2014
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
Thursday, 3 July 2014
- Re: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- Re: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- Re: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- Re: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- RE: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- Re: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- Re: [battery] Moving Battery API forward, next steps?
- Re: ISSUE-164: Correct default for charging time if unknown in battery (was: [battery] next steps and questions)
Wednesday, 2 July 2014
- Re: [webintents] Should DAP revisit WebIntents?
- Re: ISSUE-164: Correct default for charging time if unknown in battery (was: [battery] next steps and questions)
- Re: Call for potential DAP charter additions - please respond by 7 July 2014
- RE: [battery] Moving Battery API forward, next steps?
- RE: ISSUE-164: Correct default for charging time if unknown in battery (was: [battery] next steps and questions)
- Re: [webintents] Should DAP revisit WebIntents?
- Re: Call for potential DAP charter additions - please respond by 7 July 2014
- Re: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- Re: Call for potential DAP charter additions - please respond by 7 July 2014
- Re: ISSUE-164: Correct default for charging time if unknown in battery (was: [battery] next steps and questions)
- Re: [battery] Moving Battery API forward, next steps?
- Media Capture TF status update
Tuesday, 1 July 2014
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- RE: ISSUE-164: Correct default for charging time if unknown in battery (was: [battery] next steps and questions)
- RE: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- RE: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- [battery] getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern
- RE: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- RE: [battery] Moving Battery API forward, next steps?
- Re: Call for potential DAP charter additions - please respond by 7 July 2014
- [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?
- Re: ISSUE-164: Correct default for charging time if unknown in battery (was: [battery] next steps and questions)
- Re: [battery] proposed additional edit for attribute defaults
- Re: [battery] Moving Battery API forward, next steps?