- From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:44:37 +0000
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- Message-ID: <CAF40kP6U0xhKsC9Y3nzz4VSMJL7upx40BTtzcC0oemyorY7b_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Anssi, I can take a look at the Vibration API tests. They are also not up to date with the spec. How would I get started? Regards, Michael On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi < anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > This is the status of the test suites for the following deliverables for > the group: Vibration API, HTML Media Capture, and Battery Status API. > > All the specs are at CR, and the group is looking for interested folks’ > contributions to help complete the test suites. Below is the status of > each, and relevant pointers to the w-p-t GH repo. > > * Vibration API > > Test suite (partial): > > https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/vibration > > Status: > > The following test cases are missing (as per TODO.txt): > > - do nothing when hidden > - cancel when dynamically hidden > - reinstate when dynamically shown > - invalid values > > * HTML Media Capture > > Test suite (submitted for review): > > https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/306 > > Status: > > The remaining open issue "should we test SHOULD?” is discussed at: > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-test-infra/2013JulSep/0240.html > > It seems the option 3) gets most support ("add meta data to those tests > that aren't MUST requirements”). The test suite should be updated > accordingly, after which the tests should be re-reviewed and approved. > > * Battery Status API > > Test suite (approved): > > https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/battery-status > > Status: > > As per Zhiqiang: "we don't need to create more [test cases], just make the > tests easier to be run because it is difficult to prepare for testing > environment to get the event handlers to be fired.” > > Looking forward to your test contributions! > > This completes my ACTION-675. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi >
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 14:45:05 UTC