W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Standby API Specification Proposal

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:29:29 +0100
Message-ID: <1391610569.28679.169.camel@cumulustier>
To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>
Cc: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, Dariel Marlow <dmarlow@gmail.com>, "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Giri,

On mer., 2014-02-05 at 14:22 +0000, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote:
> Idle API is among the Phase 2 items for the SysApps Working Group -
> http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/.  I think this kind of proposal would
> be better discussed in that WG, since an API will be defined for idle
> user notification already.

I did notice the "Idle API" in

I agree it might be similar to what Anssi was alluding to, but taken
from the reverse perspective.

It certainly seems quite different from the prevent-standby proposal

Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 14:29:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:05 UTC