Re: Progressing Wake Lock API to W3C FPWD?

On Friday, December 12, 2014, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote:

> Ilya, Andrey, Marcos (DAP cc’d)
>
> We briefly discussed the Wake Lock API on today’s Device API
> teleconference [1].
>
> Is the github draft [2]  stable and suitable to be published as a W3C
> First Public Working Draft?
>
> If you think so, then the next step would be for me to publish a Call for
> Consensus in the working group for agreement to publish a FPWD and then if
> agreed for you to prepare a draft for publication. I would then follow up
> with a transition request.
>
> If not stable and ready, what changes do you think are still required and
> do you have an idea of the time frame?
>
> (a minor note - the use cases reference is not available even though the
> link at the top works)


I would like to wait until the w3c allows Editor's drafts on TR (just a few
more weeks I'm told). Current publication model is not ideal. We could
start the CFC, but only publish once the new pub tool becomes available.

Will check the broken link.




>
> Thanks
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair DAP
> @fjhirsch
>
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Dec/att-0009/minutes-2014-12-11.html#item08
>
> [2] http://w3c.github.io/wake-lock/
>
> For Tracker, this completes ACTION-724
>
>
>
>
>
>
>