Re: Vibration API: clamp argument

I agree we should hold off.

Do we have any idea Michael for the timeline for this work and when we might expect the syntax to be stable for [Clamp]?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Nov 1, 2013, at 6:04 AM, ext Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:

> On 31 Oct 2013, at 17:40, Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
>> Note that there is some concern that [Clamp] cannot be applied to the contents of a sequence:
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
>> 
>> It seems even the desired syntax is not fully agreed.
> 
> Thanks for the update. It seems we should not yet rush this into the spec. I suggest we leave ISSUE-156 open until WebIDL spec has been updated.
> 
> This relates to my ACTION-670.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Anssi

Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 13:05:18 UTC