W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Vibration API: clamp argument

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:55:46 +0000
To: <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>, <dom@w3.org>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <50C15189-C85F-4496-BA46-18E2D77E207B@nokia.com>
I agree we should hold off.

Do we have any idea Michael for the timeline for this work and when we might expect the syntax to be stable for [Clamp]?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Nov 1, 2013, at 6:04 AM, ext Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:

> On 31 Oct 2013, at 17:40, Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Note that there is some concern that [Clamp] cannot be applied to the contents of a sequence:
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
>> It seems even the desired syntax is not fully agreed.
> Thanks for the update. It seems we should not yet rush this into the spec. I suggest we leave ISSUE-156 open until WebIDL spec has been updated.
> This relates to my ACTION-670.
> Thanks,
> -Anssi
Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 13:05:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:01 UTC