- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:48:31 +0000
- To: <public-device-apis@w3.org>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Message-ID: <1CB2E0B458B211478C85E11A404A2B27019B5A1F@008-AM1MPN1-033.mgdnok.nokia.com>
fyi, I shared this item with Coremob regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia for tracker, ACTION-613 Begin forwarded message: From: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com<mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>> Date: March 13, 2013 9:46:12 AM EDT To: "public-coremob@w3.org<mailto:public-coremob@w3.org>" <public-coremob@w3.org<mailto:public-coremob@w3.org>> Cc: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com<mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>> Subject: Possible Coremob topic: network efficiency and APIs (& OMA Device Apps Network Efficiency) Dear CoreMob participants: The Device APIs working group (DAP) received a liaison statement from OMA (see below and attachment) regarding Device Apps Network Efficiency [1]. We think that this could be a topic best discussed in coremob, so maybe it should be added to the list of items to consider going forward. I should note that Tobie shared some comments on the DAP public list suggesting a good approach might be to create APIs that make efficiency transparent to developers [2]. What do you think of further discussing this work in coremob, and coordinating with OMA on the topic? regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair, W3C DAP Working Group [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Feb/att-0098/minutes-2013-02-20.html#item06 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Feb/0058.html Begin forwarded message: > From: ext Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org<mailto:dom@w3.org>> > Date: January 25, 2013 11:14:49 AM EST > To: <public-device-apis@w3.org<mailto:public-device-apis@w3.org>>, <bs3131@att.com<mailto:bs3131@att.com>>, Frederick.Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com<mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>> > Subject: Liaison statement from OMA on network efficiency > > Hi all, > > We have received a liaison statement from OMA on a new acitivity they're > starting, called Device Apps Network Efficiency (DANE) � see attached > document. > > The Device APIs Working Group is specifically called out as one of the > targets of the document. > > They are asking a review from their proposed work, as well as a summary > of existing W3C work in this space. > > My own reading of the liaison statement is that at the very least, our > work on the Network Information API has some relevance to that work (one > could imaging that browsers would use DANE to get information about e.g. > the available bandwidth). > > We have also discussed several times (but without any concrete proposal > that I know of) providing more advanced capabilities to optimize Web > apps usage of network capabilities � it would be useful if someone could > summarize our existing discussions to date, esp. if they could be source > of requirements for that work. > > Brian, I believe you're active in OMA, so if you have further input / > insight on useful input we could gather for OMA here, that would be > welcome. > > Frederick, it's probably worth adding to the agenda of our next call > (Feb 6). > > Thanks, > > Dom
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: OMA-LS_978-OMA_REQ_to_W3C_on_WID_279_DANE_1_0-20130124-A.pdf
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 13:49:11 UTC