[html media capture] (new) resolution of your HTML Media Capture Last Call Comments (Please respond)

Doug

The DAP WG has published an updated HTML Media Capture WD and we believe this includes changes that address all the Last Call comments you raised.

The published draft is at  http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html-media-capture-20121213/ and details are below.

Please take a look and let us know if you agree by replying to this message - if we hear no response by 18 March we will assume the issues can be closed and will close all these Last Call issues as resolved.

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair, W3C DAP Working Group


Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
> Date: December 7, 2012 10:42:19 AM EST
> To: "<schepers@w3.org>" <schepers@w3.org>
> Cc: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "DAP public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
> Subject: [html media capture] proposed (new) resolution of your HTML Media Capture Last Call Comments (Please respond)
> 
> Doug
> 
> I think the DAP Working Group has a change to the HTML Media Capture specification that should satisfactorily address the Last Call issues you raised.  Thanks very much for raising the issues and following through.
> 
> The change is to make the capture attribute a boolean with the meaning that if it is present (true) then the user agent will invoke the appropriate device capture mechanism based on the MIME type, it it is able (and if not act as if the capture attribute were not present).
> 
> This has the following implications:
> 
> LC-2637 : camcorder keyword may conflate audio and video, suggest capture is list of strings
> 
> No longer conflates items or is confusing, no longer need for strings - what is captured is specified only by MIME type.
> 
> LC-2638 : add examples
> 
> Examples have been added and extended to clarify how HTML Media Capture may function in different ways
> 
> LC-2639 : Why 'camcorder' instead of 'videocamera'? 
> 
> moot - we got rid of the keywords entirely
> 
> See the latest editors draft for details: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/
> 
> (there is also a diff, http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2009/dap/camera/Attic/unofficial.html.diff?r1=1.3;r2=1.4;f=h )
> 
> Does this latest change address your Last Call comments? 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair, W3C DAP Working Group
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/43696/WD-html-media-capture-20120712/doc/
> 
> 
> 
> 

For Tracker this should close ACTION-619

Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 19:21:26 UTC