- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 20:16:56 +0000
- To: <public-device-apis@w3.org>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <annevk@annevk.nl>
Likewise, any reason we should not consider moving Proximity API to CR (call for implementations)? As I understand it we have one LC issues that have not been officially closed [1] but I believe we addressed Anne's comments as noted here (yes, same message): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jan/0021.html (Anne do you agree we can close this) We have work on test cases underway and there is some implementation work already in progress (webkit, mozilla) [2], however that is not a requirement to enter CR, but rather to exit CR. Thus, any reason not to have a CfC to go to CR? We can discuss on the list and the next call. We may want to complete the review and pull of the test cases into git first. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair, W3C DAP Working Group [1] Tracker https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/43696/WD-proximity-20121206/doc/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus#Related_Implementation_Information_7
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 20:17:28 UTC