- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:36:48 +0100
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: Justin Lebar <justin.lebar@gmail.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > 2. Let pattern be list. Using let twice seems somewhat confusing as pattern is already something. Set pattern to list makes more sense. However, maybe this method should be variadic? I guess it might be too late to fix that? > 9. If pattern is 0, an empty list, or if the device does not > provide a vibration mechanism (or it is disabled), then return > true and terminate these steps. Pattern cannot be zero. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 10:37:17 UTC