- From: Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:02:24 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, ext Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
That sounds right. You agree that we should change the proximity event in the same way as we are doing here, right? Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Doug Turner<dougt@mozilla.com> wrote: >> +1 to combining the events. Keep in mind that we separated the proximity >> sensor events into one that reports distance and one that reports a text >> (near, far). We probably should fix that one too. >> >> Should the LightLevelState be optional? A minor concern is that we do have >> a number of devices in the field that already support this event without >> this attribute. > > It seems simpler to just require it and classify the early > implementations as experimental. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 10:02:54 UTC