Re: PFWG comments on HTML Media Capture ( LC-2635)

 Dear Michael Cooper ,

The Device APIs Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the
Last Call Working Draft [2] of the HTML Media Capture published on 12 Jul
2012. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to
send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-device-apis@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 18 September
2012. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Device APIs Working Group,
Dave Raggett
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/502ABF7F.1020705@w3.org
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html-media-capture-20120712/


=====

Your comment on 5.1 Attributes capture of type DOMString:
> The Protocols and Formats Working Group took a quick look at the HTML
> Media Capture specification
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html-media-capture-20120712/. In a
> teleconference discussion, minuted at
> https://www.w3.org/2012/07/18-pf-minutes.html, we had the following
> comments:
> 
> What happens if the requested device is not present on the system?
> People with disabilities may have a different sub-set of devices
> available than mainstream users. We suggest the specification state
> explicitly that the user agent should fall back to a standard file
> upload widget in this situation.


Working Group Resolution (LC-2635):
No change needed, addressed by the following normative prose:

"The capture attribute's invalid value default and missing value default is
the File Upload state."

----

Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 20:15:02 UTC