- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:04:59 -0700
- To: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Cc: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>, CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>, public-device-apis@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com> wrote: > So, where did we end up on 'named' lux ranges? Does anyone still see a > reason for them? I am less convinced they are useful. The feature is much harder to use without named ranges. I think the evidence in this thread may have shown that it's *practically impossible* to use without them, given the large variance in detected light levels. As noted, it appears that only three levels are necessary - normal, dim, and bright. These three levels serve the vast majority of use-cases adequately. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 20:05:49 UTC