- From: Tran, Dzung D <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 22:30:50 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- CC: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hello, I quickly put together a draft for the atmospheric pressure sensor, since I saw that this sensor was available in my Nexus Galaxy phone. Also, the use cases for this sensor are documented in the spec: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/pressure/Overview.html Thanks Dzung Tran -----Original Message----- From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 4:55 AM To: Doug Turner Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; public-device-apis@w3.org Subject: Re: CfC: Progress Ambient Temperature and Ambient Humidity Events drafts in DAP, publish FPWD of each On 24 Aug 2012, at 03:13, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com> wrote: > Is either the Ambient Temperature Events or Ambient Humidity Events > implementable at this point? Not that I know of. It could be piggy-backed on Android, but... > I looked at various popular > phones/devices and none come with capable sensors. Did I miss one? I also looked but could not find any. > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:35 AM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: >> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to progress the Ambient Temperature Events and Ambient Humidity Events drafts in DAP and to also publish a FPWD of each when the CfC completes. It includes the following resolutions: >> >> 1. RESOLUTION: progress the Ambient Temperature Events and Ambient >> Humidity Events drafts in DAP >> >> 2. RESOLUTION: publish FPWD of Ambient Temperature Events, having >> shortname 'temperature', >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/temperature/Overview.html >> >> 3. RESOLUTION: publish FPWD of Ambient Humidity Events, having >> shortname 'humidity', >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/humidity/Overview.html >> >> Please review the current drafts and make the comments you believe you need to make before next week, at which point we'll make the decision to publish or not. >> >> Note that there is no requirement on FPWDs to be perfect — if they were perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader review, and reasonably feature-complete. >> >> Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >> Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group >> >> For tracker this should complete ACTION-570 >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 22:31:19 UTC