- From: NN Murthy <nn.murthy@cmcltd.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:52:23 +0530
- To: "'Anssi Kostiainen'" <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
It is interesting and addressing the issue we have to specify a device type such as "camera" or some other device type. -----Original Message----- From: Anssi Kostiainen [mailto:anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com] Sent: 29 November 2012 21:17 To: DAP public-device-apis@w3.org Subject: [capture] making capture attribute boolean, the first stab Hi, As per my ACTION-595, and as discussed on the yesterday's call, I started to look at how the HTML Media Capture spec might look like -- and what the implications might be -- if we'd make the capture attribute a boolean instead of an enumerated attribute. The short rationale is that we don't want to duplicate the information that is already expressed with the accept attribute. Also, given the feature is not yet widely deployed, we can probably still change things for better. I started writing the proposal in a mail first, but quickly found out it would be easier for everyone if I make an unofficial draft instead so that you'll get a proper diff etc. So I branched the spec, and reworked it. I also added new examples that should clarify how the revised spec would actually be used in both simple declarative-only scenario based on an HTML form, and in more advanced use cases involving scripting, such as upload via XHR, or drawing the captured image to a canvas on the client-side. I also wanted to clarify that uploading of the file is optional and that this feature is useful in client-side only scenarios too. The "new" unofficial version with a boolean capture is at: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/unofficial.html The "old" Editor's Draft with an enumerated attribute is at: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/ The diff: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2009/dap/camera/unofficial.html.diff?r1=1.1;r2=1.2; f=h That said, I'm looking for feedback whether we should go the boolean route. Also suggestions how to make the boolean spec better are welcome. There are probably some rough edges as I drafted this one rather quickly. -Anssi ______________________________________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or directly to netsupport@cmcltd.com or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. ______________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scrubbed for your protection by SecureMX. For more information visit http://securemx.in _____________________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 07:24:01 UTC