Re: [proximity] The initial state of the proximity sensor (was: Tests and ref imp)

On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 08:34, Anssi Kostiainen wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> On 23.5.2012, at 2.18, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
>  
> > Having said that, not having the initial state of the proximity sensor is an issue (and should probably be marked as such in the spec).
>  
> By initial state, do you refer to the discussion we had around the alternative sync API proposal (navigator.proximitystate) that addressed this concern but was cumbersome to implement? Here's the old proposal:
>  
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/336825e8a8a2/proximity/Overview.html#the-proximitystate-attribute
Could not find the initial state in the link above, but I assume so…. I think your other email already addresses with with regards to determining freshness.  

--  
Marcos Caceres

http://datadriven.com.au  

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 11:53:46 UTC