Re: System Level APIs draft proposal

On 2012-05-04 14:31, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>On Friday, May 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Dave Raggett wrote:
>> On 04/05/12 12:40, Niklas Widell wrote:
>> > Robin,
>> > On the charter, given objective to build separate environment,
>>wouldn't it
>> > make sense to also include app packaging, life-cycle
>>(install/uninstall)
>> > etc in the charter, or is this assumed proprietary or based on
>>existing
>> > standards (e.g. Widget specs)?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> App packaging is in the new charter for the Web Apps WG, but the SL WG
>> may have additional requirements, in which case, it would be good to
>> handle these as extensions to the spec developed by the Web Apps WG.
>> 
>
>Indeed. Please let WebApps know if there are any additional use
>cases/requirements around packaging.

Sorry, I was apparently comparing to non-final version of web apps
charter, which did not have the packaging except for widgets, so no
additional requirements other than that this ought to be done somewhere.

Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 12:17:07 UTC