RE: web intents version of sensor api

Are you not a believer in using webintents for this?  Or that it should be one spec for such similar sensors instead of 7 separate, similar specs?  Or not a believer in supporting the sensors?

From: Doug Turner []
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:44 AM
To: Carr, Wayne
Subject: Re: web intents version of sensor api

I am not a believer. -1.

On Mar 24, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Carr, Wayne wrote:

Before dropping the sensor API I think it would be useful to consider what a sensor API spec would look like if changed to using WebIntents.  Does the WG really want 7 different drafts for these sensor types that would all be virtually identical?

This is very informally sketched out just to show the general idea.  It seems very straightforward using webintents, but something does have to specify what the formats are.

* GetSensorData – one shot request to get a value.
* WatchSendorData – sets up stream of data from sensor.  Can ask for data only when trigger points are crossed or instead periodic reports but no more frequently than some interval.

**** fields for the webintents constructor for the request ****

Actions (one of these):

Or “” instead of “”

type (one of these):

function is passed for OnSuccess return data

For only,
a message channel port is passed to the service in the intent request.
In extraData the following can be passed [optional]
ReportInterval= string containing a double value – requests service to send sensor data no more frequently than every ReportIntervalmilliseconds

**** response from service to client ****

For” response from server is sent to OnSuccess function passed when making the intents request.
For response is sent to the port passed to the server

Returned Information in “data” object from sensor sent in either the OnSuccess function for a GetSensorData action or to the port for GetWatchData
Fields in data object
* action (one of the above or new ones from future specs)
* type (one of the above or new ones from future specs)
* double minInRange – minimum value in sensor range
* double maxInRange – maximum value in sensor range
* string name – if the sensor has some friendly name for the sensor
* value -- array in the following units of measure (typically only the first value in array is set, but array in case future devices have more than one Proximity Sensor for instance)  double centigrade  double kiloPascal  double percent double Lux double dbA double centimeter objects containing double x,y,z in micro-Tesla

**** control messages on port to service ****

Client can send service a sensorControl object using the port – format of object sent is as follows:
* type (one of the above or new ones from future specs)
* command – one of the following
      setTriggerPoint value --- where value is a single double for the sensors that return a single value and a comma separate list of doubles for DevMagneticField – can send this repeatedly for different triggers
      removeTriggerPoint value --- same as what was set
      setReportInterval --- double seconds to indicate reports should not be sent more frequently than this
      stopWatchpoint – going to be closing the port

Service responds by sending a data object echoing the same but ending with result= string “success” or “fail”

Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:49:06 UTC