- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:56:09 +0200
- To: <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com> <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com>
- Cc: <public-device-apis@w3.org>, <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Hi Cathy, On Jun 27, 2012, at 23:41 , <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com> <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com> wrote: > I notice that the ContactIntentExtras dictionary contains a fields item > which is DOMString[]. Meanwhile, the getExtra() method of Intent is spec'd > to return a DOMString. Whoa, good catch! > I suppose it would be necessary to modify the > getExtra() method to work with the dictionary definition (and to be more > flexible in general)? Say, returning any instead of DOMString? Actually, one thing that we discussed before (and that is pending on implementers telling us if it's actually possible — Greg had concerns that there may be issues) was just exposing an |extras| attribute instead of getExtra(). That attribute would contain all that was provided for extras, presumably filtered through structured cloning or some such. If doable, I personally much prefer that solution. Not to offend anyone, but using getExtra() to access what is most likely initially provided as an object literal feels very much Java-ish to me! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 11:56:39 UTC