RE: drafting March f2f agenda

Hi Frederick,

I would like to include a discussion on Web Intents in the context of local services according to the discussion on the mailing list and proposals on the wiki:

Furthermore, the discussion on a simplified approach to Web Intents needs to addressed at the meeting. So, I am considering if just one day is enough for Web Intents. Continuing with Web Intents in the morning of day 2 might be needed (under the assumption that interested people will stay).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: []
> Sent: den 14 februari 2012 23:16
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: drafting March f2f agenda
> I have created a rough draft for an agenda for the F2F 20-22 March to
> help us review and create an agenda, see
> 22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China
> 22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China#Day_3.2C_Thursday_22_March_2012_.289_am_
> -_4_pm.29
> Some thoughts:
> 1) WebIntents on Day 1 reflects our general agreement to review and
> progress WebIntents on day !. I also think it would be useful to review
> how we intend to progress Contacts given our understanding of
> WebIntents. We probably should also review and plan to document
> privacy/security of device APIs in the context of WebIntents.
> 2) I suggest the WG as a whole should understand the status of the
> Media Capture task force, perhaps a member of that task force can
> volunteer to lead a session to review and discuss that work. This can
> help socialize the work and also encourage additional participation and
> feedback to the TF.
> 3) We probably should consider how to move Battery and Vibration to CR,
> this might happen on a teleconference before the F2F (after 1 March for
> Vibration), but maybe it is an appropriate decision for the F2F.
> 4) Although work on  test cases and interop can happen out of the main
> WG calls, maybe we can start work on this at the F2F, raising any
> issues we might have.
> Timings and topics are all a rough take, just to get us started. If you
> plan to call in, you should indicate if a topic you can contribute to
> should be moved in the schedule. I'm not sure we can juggle everything
> to everyone's satisfaction, but we can try. We also need to get a clear
> understanding of who plans to attend in person, and who plans to call
> in, including those working on WebIntents that are not in DAP.
> I tentatively put 9-5 for day 1, 2 and 9-4 for day 3, but we should
> discuss.
> Do you see any missing topics?
> thanks
> regards, Frederick
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 13:58:37 UTC