RE: drafting March f2f agenda

Hi Fred,

I would kindly request a time slot (in the beginning) on Day-1 for a "Host Presentation", the content of which will be distributed in the due course. 


Deepanshu Gautam
Service Standards, Huawei
O: +86 25 56620008 M: +8613585147627

> -----Original Message-----
> From: []
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:16 AM
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: drafting March f2f agenda
> I have created a rough draft for an agenda for the F2F 20-22 March to help us
> review and create an agenda, see
> 22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China#Day_3.2C_Thursday_22_March_2012_.289_am_-
> _4_pm.29
> Some thoughts:
> 1) WebIntents on Day 1 reflects our general agreement to review and progress
> WebIntents on day !. I also think it would be useful to review how we intend
> to progress Contacts given our understanding of WebIntents. We probably should
> also review and plan to document privacy/security of device APIs in the
> context of WebIntents.
> 2) I suggest the WG as a whole should understand the status of the Media
> Capture task force, perhaps a member of that task force can volunteer to lead
> a session to review and discuss that work. This can help socialize the work
> and also encourage additional participation and feedback to the TF.
> 3) We probably should consider how to move Battery and Vibration to CR, this
> might happen on a teleconference before the F2F (after 1 March for Vibration),
> but maybe it is an appropriate decision for the F2F.
> 4) Although work on  test cases and interop can happen out of the main WG
> calls, maybe we can start work on this at the F2F, raising any issues we might
> have.
> Timings and topics are all a rough take, just to get us started. If you plan
> to call in, you should indicate if a topic you can contribute to should be
> moved in the schedule. I'm not sure we can juggle everything to everyone's
> satisfaction, but we can try. We also need to get a clear understanding of who
> plans to attend in person, and who plans to call in, including those working
> on WebIntents that are not in DAP.
> I tentatively put 9-5 for day 1, 2 and 9-4 for day 3, but we should discuss.
> Do you see any missing topics?
> thanks
> regards, Frederick
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 09:24:13 UTC