- From: Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:09:45 +0000
- To: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <52F8A45B68FD784E8E4FEE4DA9C6E52A33EFB9BD@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Passing on comments from others on sensor API draft 10 November 2011 version, http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/Sensors.html 1. Section 6.1.1 lists for Attribute status: “disconnected” – this state is not used. I suggest to remove it or define its use. 2. Section 6.1.2 functions endWatch, read and startWatch refer to ILLEGAL_STATE exceptions, which are not defined. In my opinion, this should probably be INVALID_STATE_ERR (http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html#DOMException-INVALID_STATE_ERR<http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html> ) 3. Section 8.1 Sensor Error defines the PERMISSION_DENIED error code to be a negative -100 value even though the type is unsigned short. 4. Important: Section 6.1.2 [Constructor(SensorOptions options)]: This paragraph describes the algorithm for sensor lookup at construction time of the object. From an implementer’s perspective, this requires a DOM implementation to wrap a potentially asynchronous operation (cmp. findSensors()) into a synchronous constructor. I think this should be rewritten to queue a sensor lookup task and always return a SensorConncetion object in state new. When the lookup task completes, state transitions should occur which are signaled through “onstatuschange” or “onerror”. In the case of a successful lookup, the state should change to open. In the case of failure, it should transition to error. As mentioned: Both signaled through the corresponding status change handlers. 5. In the implementation it has been useful to add a return code NO_SENSOR_FOUND = 101 to section 8.1 in cases where a lookup didn’t come back with any sensor result but no unforeseen error occurred.
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 19:10:24 UTC