- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:08:57 +0200
- To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: "Anssi Kostiainen" <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>, "ext JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA" <jmcf@tid.es>, "public-device-apis@w3.org WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:06:03 +0200, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > On Oct 7, 2011, at 11:19 , Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:12:59 +0200, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> >> wrote: >>> Normally that special regimen only applies to HTML5. But I suspect >>> that this will not be the last spec to want to refer to DOM4 so a >>> similar situation is likely to arise. >> >> HTML5 depends on DOM4, so just reference that instead :-P > > And everyone references WebIDL, which still has features in flux, and in > turn relies (normatively) on Perl. We're all screwed I tell you :) Or just maybe the W3C Process is the one that is screwed. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 10:09:42 UTC