W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Review of the Battery Status Event specification

From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:22:29 +0300
CC: <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A9DC081E-1B06-4C91-9C3F-63AC4A08102F@nokia.com>
To: ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>

On 25.5.2011, at 17.42, ext Robin Berjon wrote:

> On May 25, 2011, at 14:45 , Robin Berjon wrote:
>> we recently published a FPWD of the Battery Status Event, here are some comments on the current draft
> I forgot to ask this question: Should we indicate that the battery event is also available on the WorkerGlobalScope in addition to Window? It would seem to make sense.

IMHO it does make a lot of sense, because currently also some parts of the navigator such as the onLine attribute (and the online and offline events) are available to workers. I baked this requirement into the spec too.

Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 13:20:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:28 UTC